<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are we sharing solutions or soundbites?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://altitudebranding.com/2008/12/are-we-sharing-solutions-or-soundbites/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://altitudebranding.com/2008/12/are-we-sharing-solutions-or-soundbites/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 17:29:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Friends are not the same as influence &#171; Media Bullseye &#8211; A New Media and Communications Magazine</title>
		<link>http://altitudebranding.com/2008/12/are-we-sharing-solutions-or-soundbites/comment-page-1/#comment-12551</link>
		<dc:creator>Friends are not the same as influence &#171; Media Bullseye &#8211; A New Media and Communications Magazine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 20:25:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://altitudebranding.com/?p=380#comment-12551</guid>
		<description>[...] Naslund&#8217;s excellent piece on social media kicks off the second topic. Her post makes the direct and astute point that social media advocates [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="padding: 1em">
<p>[...] Naslund&#8217;s excellent piece on social media kicks off the second topic. Her post makes the direct and astute point that social media advocates [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GeorgeGSmithJr &#187; Evolutions of Social Media Marketing</title>
		<link>http://altitudebranding.com/2008/12/are-we-sharing-solutions-or-soundbites/comment-page-1/#comment-4164</link>
		<dc:creator>GeorgeGSmithJr &#187; Evolutions of Social Media Marketing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 01:32:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://altitudebranding.com/?p=380#comment-4164</guid>
		<description>[...] I stumbled across a great post by Amber Naslund entitled, &#8220;Are we sharing Solutions or Soundbytes?&#8221; The article caught my attention because, as I start developing my ideals for the Social [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="padding: 1em">
<p>[...] I stumbled across a great post by Amber Naslund entitled, &#8220;Are we sharing Solutions or Soundbytes?&#8221; The article caught my attention because, as I start developing my ideals for the Social [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TC/Copywriter Underground</title>
		<link>http://altitudebranding.com/2008/12/are-we-sharing-solutions-or-soundbites/comment-page-1/#comment-2024</link>
		<dc:creator>TC/Copywriter Underground</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:15:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://altitudebranding.com/?p=380#comment-2024</guid>
		<description>So often the social media space is proselytized with an almost religious fervor, yet concrete results (for non SM organizations) aren&#039;t always in evidence. 

I consult (and teach) online marketing, and while my clients are interested in SM, the question isn&#039;t whether it&#039;s cool or even potentially useful.

It&#039;s how SM fares in comparison to other (less sexy) media channels, and the question I always end up asking is &quot;where is our time best spent?&quot;\

A recent &quot;Reasons for writers to Twitter&quot; post built an impressive list - only one of which had showed any concrete evidence of a revenue benefit. 

The rest were glitzy, but hardly compelling to a freelancer looking for his next paycheck.

Social media can be incredibly useful, but like any media channel, it has to be relevant and yes, profitable.

&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;TC/Copywriter Undergrounds last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://copywriterunderground.com/2009/01/08/tv-shows-leverages-twitter-with-one-two-mystery-pitch/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;TV Show Leverages Twitter With One-Two Mystery Pitch&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So often the social media space is proselytized with an almost religious fervor, yet concrete results (for non SM organizations) aren&#8217;t always in evidence. </p>
<p>I consult (and teach) online marketing, and while my clients are interested in SM, the question isn&#8217;t whether it&#8217;s cool or even potentially useful.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s how SM fares in comparison to other (less sexy) media channels, and the question I always end up asking is &#8220;where is our time best spent?&#8221;\</p>
<p>A recent &#8220;Reasons for writers to Twitter&#8221; post built an impressive list &#8211; only one of which had showed any concrete evidence of a revenue benefit. </p>
<p>The rest were glitzy, but hardly compelling to a freelancer looking for his next paycheck.</p>
<p>Social media can be incredibly useful, but like any media channel, it has to be relevant and yes, profitable.</p>
<p><abbr><em><abbr><em>TC/Copywriter Undergrounds last blog post..<a href="http://copywriterunderground.com/2009/01/08/tv-shows-leverages-twitter-with-one-two-mystery-pitch/" rel="nofollow">TV Show Leverages Twitter With One-Two Mystery Pitch</a></em></abbr></em></abbr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
